If Incident Management is about orchestrating the response , then Incident Analysis is about making sure you are responding to the right problem . I’ve seen organizations execute incident response plans flawlessly—only to later discover they misunderstood what actually happened. They contained the wrong systems, preserved the wrong evidence, and briefed executives with incomplete narratives. That is why NIST CSF 2.0 Respond – Incident Analysis (RS.AN) is a distinct and critical category. It exists to ensure that decisions made during response are grounded in accurate, evolving understanding of the incident. What Is Incident Analysis (RS.AN) in NIST CSF 2.0? RS.AN focuses on the organization’s ability to investigate and analyze cybersecurity incidents to understand cause, scope, impact, and attacker behavior . Put simply, RS.AN answers: “What actually happened, how did it happen, and what does it mean?” Incident analysis builds on detection and adverse event analysis, but goes furthe...

Detection gets the attention. Response defines the outcome. In my career, I’ve seen organizations with excellent detection capabilities still suffer outsized damage because they could not manage incidents in a disciplined, repeatable way . Tools didn’t fail them— process and leadership did . That is why NIST CSF 2.0 Respond – Incident Management (RS.IM) is one of the most business-critical categories in the entire framework. For aspiring CISOs and early-career security professionals, RS.IM is where cybersecurity becomes executive-level crisis management. What Is Incident Management (RS.IM) in NIST CSF 2.0? RS.IM focuses on an organization’s ability to effectively respond to cybersecurity incidents through coordinated, structured, and governed actions . In plain terms, RS.IM answers: “When something bad happens, do we respond deliberately—or chaotically?” Under CSF 2.0, Incident Management includes: Incident declaration and classification Roles, responsibilities, and authority Coordin...

Detecting an event is only half the battle. What separates an effective security organization from a noisy one is the ability to analyze what was detected and determine whether it actually matters . That is the role of NIST CSF 2.0 Detect – Adverse Event Analysis (DE.AE) . If DE.CM is about seeing activity, DE.AE is about understanding it. For aspiring CISOs and early-career security professionals, DE.AE is where analytical rigor, judgment, and business context come together. What Is DE.AE in NIST CSF 2.0? DE.AE focuses on the organization’s ability to analyze detected events to understand their scope, impact, and significance . In practical terms, DE.AE answers: “Now that we’ve detected something, what does it actually mean?” Under CSF 2.0, Adverse Event Analysis includes: Confirming whether an event is malicious or benign Determining affected assets, users, and data Assessing business and operational impact Establishing confidence levels for response decisions Without DE.AE, org...

If I had to identify one capability that separates mature security programs from reactive ones, it would be continuous monitoring . Firewalls, endpoint tools, and cloud controls don’t protect an organization on their own. What protects the organization is the ongoing ability to detect abnormal behavior quickly, consistently, and at scale . That is precisely what NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) 2.0 – Detect: Continuous Monitoring (DE.CM) is designed to address. For new security professionals and aspiring CISOs, understanding DE.CM is foundational. It is where strategy becomes execution and where visibility turns into risk reduction. What Is DE.CM in NIST CSF 2.0? Detect – Continuous Monitoring (DE.CM) focuses on ensuring that an organization continuously observes its environment to identify cybersecurity events . In CSF 2.0, detection is no longer viewed as a purely technical function. DE.CM explicitly spans: Networks Endpoints Applications Cloud resources Third-party connections U...

Modern enterprises depend on technology everywhere . From cloud workloads to on-prem servers, from network devices to IoT sensors, businesses operate on the assumption that infrastructure “just works.” But what happens when it doesn’t? Critical applications go offline Customers can’t access services Production lines grind to a halt Data is temporarily unavailable or corrupted PR.IR – Technology Infrastructure Resilience – exists because availability, redundancy, and recoverability are as important as confidentiality and integrity . If systems fail and cannot recover, even perfectly configured identity and data controls won’t save the organization. How PR.IR Fits Into the Protect Function So far in Protect, we’ve focused on: PR.AA – Identity and access PR.AT – Human awareness and training PR.DS – Data protection PR.PS – Platform security PR.IR addresses the next question: “Even with strong access, trained people, protected data, and secure platforms, how do we ensure technology cont...

Most organizations don’t get breached because they chose the wrong cloud provider, operating system, or endpoint platform. They get breached because those platforms were not securely configured, maintained, or governed over time . Platform Security (PR.PS) exists because attackers don’t usually defeat technology—they exploit neglect : Unpatched systems Misconfigurations Unsupported platforms Inconsistent security baselines PR.PS is where cybersecurity discipline shows up every day , long after the architecture diagrams are finished. How PR.PS Fits Into the Protect Function So far in the Protect function: PR.AA answered who can access systems PR.AT addressed how people behave PR.DS focused on what data is truly at risk PR.PS answers the next critical question: Are the platforms we depend on actually secure by design and by default? “Platforms” include: Servers (on-prem and cloud) Endpoints Operating systems Containers Virtual machines Cloud services Core infrastructure components If...